Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Mag360 Top Banner



What You Need to Know About Genetically Engineered Salmon


Some might say we’ve reached a new and potentially dangerous low with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s approval of genetically engineered (GE) salmon. Worse, when these “Frankenfish” hit the market you’ll have no way of knowing, since the FDA will not require the producer to label the product as genetically modified.

FDA Continued Tests Despite a Ban on the Sale of GE Salmon

Apparently they were confident in the powers that be, because despite a 2011 ban on the sale of GE salmon, the FDA moved forward with testing. Why? Your guess is as good as ours. (Though we have a few good ones…) Nonetheless, now that the FDA has deemed that AquAdvantage Salmon, a patented fish genetically modified to grow at twice the rate of conventional salmon, is safe for consumption, the company that developed it is set to outsource once-American fishermen’s jobs by beginning production in Panama and Canada.

Many opponents have expressed concerns over the safety of the GE salmon ranging from the potential threat it poses to the environment and marine life (What if one or more of the fish “jumps ship” and contaminates natural resources?) to the lack of thorough assessments completed before the FDA’s approval, calling assessments thus far “flawed and inadequate.

In 2012, Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety noted, “The GE salmon has no socially redeeming value; it’s bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. FDA’s decision is premature and misguided.”

Which brings up another risk associated with the GE salmon’s approval: instability of the salmon industry and the economies associated with it.

Not surprisingly, most vocal about the threats of GE salmon are lawmakers such as Senator Lisa Ann Murkowski and Senator Donald Young. The two see the outsourced food supply as a great threat to the economy in their state of Alaska and have been fighting the approval of the unnecessary biohack since 2010.

Back in 2012, Senator Murkowski said in a statement, “I am concerned with the recent news that FDA is moving forward with the approval of genetically modified fish. This is especially troubling as the agency is ignoring the opposition by salmon and fishing groups, as well as more than 300 environmental, consumer and health organizations.”

Another Sign That Our Food System is Corrupt?

It’s no secret that current decision makers in Washington have close ties with Monsanto and other biotech giants. Looking at Michael Taylor’s career alone speaks volumes. The current Deputy Commissioner for Foods at the FDA is infamous for his tendency to go where biotech giants need him. After earning a degree in political science, he held a roles at the FDA for nearly 5 years (1976-1981), then worked as an attorney for Monsanto (1981-1988), then went back to the FDA (1991-1994), then moved over to the USDA (1994-1996), then back to the law firm representing Monsanto (1996-2000). And, sadly, Taylor’s back-and-forth career path is not uncommon. So how can we be assured that decisions out of the FDA are trustworthy?

FDA Says GE Salmon Is Actually a Drug

Because of its genetic modifications, AquAdvantage’s salmon is technically not even a food, says the FDA, because the modifications are so dramatic that it “meets the definition of a drug.”

USA Today Reports:

The AquAdvantage contains a gene from its close cousin, the Chinook salmon, as well as a bit of molecular machinery, taken from the ocean pout fish, which turns on the growth gene year-round, instead of only in the warmer months. The added genetic material helps the AquAdvantage salmon — produced by AquaBounty Technologies, a Massachusetts biotechnology company — grow twice as fast as ordinary farmed salmon, even though they eat 10% less food.

How You Can Avoid Consuming GE Salmon

The GE fish are not expected to hit shelves for at least a year. However, unfortunately there will be no way of identifying them, since there is no requirement to label the food as genetically modified. Your best bet will be to buy USDA certified organic or wild-caught salmon, however, here is a list of companies that have pledged to not sell GE salmon.  GE-free_seafood_company_policy_chart-no_restaurants_6-5-14


Healthy Living Starts Here

Never miss out on valuable information. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

Leave a Comment Below

12 responses to “What You Need to Know About Genetically Engineered Salmon”

  1. Sue says:

    I am not in favor of genetically engineered salmon or
    Other foods that are also on the same path. I also think people should be given a choice as to whether
    They are with careful labeling that people can read
    before making their food choices in their local supermarkets otherwise people may be led to believe some food product is really healthy
    for them when in fact it is not.

    Thank you for this post about the salmon.

    • mike says:

      Farm raised salmon is scary enough. My wife & I will not eat it. Make the people who want frakenfish eat it for 3 years before selling it to the public

  2. Ringo Karma says:

    We need legislation requiring resteraunts to identify any GMO foods on menus.

    • Shirley Schnee says:

      I also agree as our government won’t take any responsibility for that (any more than they do with anything these days)

    • mike says:

      For sure every American should know what they are eating. We could test it on the isis group. I’am sure they would be dead before bo gets them

  3. will weber says:

    There is absolutely no excuse for not requiring the fish to be labeled. However, I am disappointed that harm to me as a consumer of the GE fish were not set forth. ie. Is consumption going to adversely affect my health or the functioning of my digestion, liver, kidney, metabolism etc. The argument against was not convincing.

  4. Another example of government being trustworthy about as far as one can kick a lead-filled, dry-docked Aircraft Carrier with five infected toes on a broken foot!

  5. Shirley Schnee says:

    That is very scary to think the stores can sell that fish without marking it so people will know what they are buying. I am an avid salmon eater as are others in my family. I certainly hope Costco will add their name to the list of stores who will not sell the genetically modified salmon. I guess I will have to forgo my love of salmon and that will be difficult to do.

  6. Henry Sarbiewski says:

    Up to this point I have been eating and enjoying salmon regularly. Since it won’t be labeled; I will no longer eat any salmon at all.
    Let the corrupt bureaucrats at the FDA eat it!

  7. Gail Ellis says:

    If it is not required to be labeled how will the buyers know? This is as low as it goes for the people of this earth and the salmon. ALL FOOD needs to be labeled so we know what we are eating. You know they will be let loose at some point to join the wild salmon and then what. It is an outrage!!!

  8. mora henskens says:

    I hate the idea of Genetically Engineered Salmon as well as the other GMO products!! At least the Government should see to it that these products are properly labeled so that the people have a choice! How does one know whether these GMO”s are not harmful to your constitution. I have absolutely no fate in the FDA!

  9. Wayne Carr says:

    I too will no longer eat salmon. I will not be putting an American fisherman out of a job either, as the farming and processing will take place in Canada and Panama. The FDA, by the way, does very little if anything to protect the public and has made a grave error in allowing AquaBounty to produce and sell their monstrosity. All this does is give the other DNA hackers free reign to cobble together increasingly frightening “creations”. Just one more example of our government selling out the citizens.